Cultured and educated
Cultured
and educated
Manoj Kumar Patel
One
of my colleagues lost his job amidst the lockdown period that is prevailing all
across the world since the beginning of this year that is the beginning of the
year 2020. An accident took place in the section for which he was the
in-charge. But at the same time, he was absent on the day of the accident.
Management handpicked him as the cause for the accident and removed him from
the services of the organization.
My colleague has two children
the elder one is just stepping into the higher secondary and the younger is
stepping into secondary education. His termination came at the time when he
needed expenses at the highest for admissions of his children into the next
levels of education.
The accident that took place in
the section is a repetition that has been happening for at least the last 2
years. There is a full-fledged safety department to analyze and find out the
root causes of accidents. Every time an accident takes place the matter is
closed by the safety officer with the full concurrence of the top management.
Point is – every time root
cause mentioned is WRONG otherwise why repetitions of accidents taking place in
the same section. The point to ponder is either there is a gross mistake going
on the business in-process or a gross mistake in the use of the right quality
of chemicals used in that plant. Unfortunately, neither of these did come up in
any of the accident investigation reports.
Hence, it can be fairly
concluded that the termination of the section in charge was not just. Now,
examine the case. What we find are:
Ø The problem
is not there with the in-charge but with process or materials or both the
process and the materials.
Ø Management
showed its poor management practice by resuming operation by showing to the
authorities that they have initiated actions against the in charge. This is a
myopic view by the management.
Ø
The terminated in charge did not speak anything
against the biased action on him by his management.
Not going any further into this
subject we will stop here to make a loud thought – who is cultured and
educated?
From the chain of incidences,
it appears that it is the in-charge that is appearing to be more cultured and
educated over the management. We call him cultured and educated because:
v He has maintained discipline
and subordination intact even though he was punished for an accident
where he was not present on the factory premises.
v He did not question the weird the behaviour of the management and the HR department despite the facts that he was
not given a chance to defend himself through an internal inquiry and knowing
fully well that both the HR and the management unfair not only to him but to
the entire protocol of the organization
v He showed Inner cleanliness,
keeping the mind and the intellect serene and sacred, free from dirt.
In essence, do not rush to
conclude. Following others’ reactions is not desirable. One must resolve any
action only after intelligent discrimination and inquiry.
The HR department and the
management behaved the way sheep behave in herds. Born as people, moving about
as educated persons, yet stupidly following others as sheep do and polluting
the minds with ideas borrowed from the lips of others — these things are to be
avoided.
The terminated in charge is now
on the path of entrepreneurship. That is he is growing faster than his earlier
place of work.
Surrender yourself to the
Almighty and HE will take care of you, the way he is taking care of each one in
this Universe.
Pseudo cultured and ill educated are everywhere. I feel pity for the in charge described in your article.
ReplyDelete